In 1952, after touring the nation, Mayor Bowron found it necessary just before the City's 171st birthday celebration to convene a panel of 20 experts to define the true pronunciation. But, the results were inconclusive - no definitive pronunciation was proclaimed or adopted.
Perhaps we just rest assured by the words of Jack Smith: "I suppose there will never be any right way to say Los Angeles."
Mr. Smith is probably right. Even with our current Mayor's heritage, his pronunciation is more anglicized than that of Irishman Tom LaBonge, who uses the LA Times masthead version: "Loce Ahng-hail-ais."
(And don't get me started on pronouncing Los Feliz and the grammatical errors involved.)
Post Script...
It's interesting to note that in that same year of convening a committee to adopt an official pronunciation (1952), the L.A. Times referred to Mayor Bowron's true opinion:
"Although reluctant to reveal his personal pronunciation of the City's name, the Mayor prayed that civic pride would prevent its citizens from ever, ever referring to it as 'L.A.'"Guess we've all messed that up.
Post Post Script...
Speaking of pronunciations, does anyone remember what Al Gore said when he came to Pacoima? Yep, he called it "Pack-o-ee-ma"; he tried to fit in, he really did. Too bad it was not the right time to use Spanish pronunciations for a Tongva word.
1 comment:
The measure of being an Angelino - or here long enough to be an considered Angelino (what is that now...2 years? 2 months? 2 months with 8 punches on your Coffee Bean? Long enough to know they no longer have cards?) is knowing how to pronounce "Cahuenga". If someone can get through directions without stammering "Cah...hoo..eenga", "Ca-hueengi", "Ca-hu-ingahhh"...or other sad little permutations, if they just hit it, they're either Latino or from around these parts. That's my measure, anyway.
Post a Comment